Grand Challenges

نویسنده

  • Bernhard Moser
چکیده

The function and eventual fate of immune cells is largely determined by factors controlling their movement through distinct parts of our body. And the molecular basis for this control is provided for by chemoattractants and cell adhesion molecules. This importance of immune cell traffic in immunity has not always been fully appreciated. In fact, cellular immunology has traditionally concentrated on cause– effect relationships by, for instance, injecting vaccines into mice and, after a period of time, removing the spleens and lymph nodes for extraction and in vitro analysis of effector cells. Mice were viewed as black magic boxes that provided the essential inventory for allowing immune responses to occur. That immune cells need to “move” in order to achieve effector functions was clear. However, this topic was regarded as a subject of cell biology rather than immunology. This view definitely changed with the discovery of chemokines in the second half of the 1980s. Initially, chemokine studies focused on innate immunity. Consequently, progress in this new field of research was discussed at Gordon Research Conferences on Phagocytes (and related meetings), alongside with “classical” chemoattractants such as formyl-Met-LeuPhe, platelet-activating factor, leukotriene B4, and complement component C5a. Combining chemokines with non-peptide chemoattractants made sense since they all act via G-protein coupled, seven transmembrane domains receptors (GPCR). Unlike non-peptide chemoattractants, chemokines are related in structure, both at the level of DNA and protein and, importantly, make up the largest family of cytokines. Currently, we know the genes for >50 chemokines and 20 chemokine receptors. Importantly, this system is characterized by redundancies both in terms of the number of chemokines recognized by a single chemokine receptor and the number of receptors shared by individual chemokines. The term “chemokines” stems from “chemotactic cytokines” and signifies their prototype function “chemotaxis” of immune cells, i.e., their movement along a concentration gradient of chemoattractants. By a process called “inside-out” signaling triggering of chemokine receptors induces a low-tohigh affinity shift in integrins, enabling firm adhesion of cells to integrin ligands present on other cells, such as vascular endothelial cells, or extracellular matrix. The former process is a prerequisite of immune cell extravasation and the latter process forms an integral part in immune cell chemotaxis. Both processes illustrate the intimate link between chemotaxis and cell adhesion. Rapid progress in chemokine research revealed that not only innate immune cells but all cells of the entire immune system respond to this large class of cytokines. The control of immune cell traffic is challenged by the considerable diversity in cell types, including precursor cells in the bone marrow and thymus, mature immune cells in blood, short-lived effector T and B cells at sites of infections as well as immune surveillance cells in healthy peripheral tissues. This problem is solved by the combination of distinct chemokine receptors with adhesion receptors, yielding precise address codes for guiding individual immune cell subsets to their target tissues. Obviously, mistakes in this system can cause severe immune defects with pathophysiological consequences, including chronic infections and autoimmunity. The field of immune cell migration poses many unsolved challenges. But chemoattractants go well beyond chemotaxis, as outlined in the below figure. In fact, the functional diversity is substantial to a degree that the writing of comprehensive review articles is a thing of the past. The below bullet point comments illustrate some of the big challenges faced by laboratories working in this highly competitive field of research.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

We've Been Framed! Ends, Means, and the Ethics of the Grand(iose) Challenges

Since the United States’ National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges were first publicly articulated in 2008, engineering educators have used its ideas to motivate their work. While there is a sense of moral imperative around pursuing selected Challenges, work that critically examines the ethics of the Grand Challenges has so far been rare. In this paper, examining the process surroundin...

متن کامل

The Grand Challenges and nursing.

66 V O L U M E 5 8 W hat are the Grand Challenges? For nearly 30 years, governments around the world have been allocating their resources to address problems known by several specific names, but generally known as the Grand Challenges. These problems were modeled after the work of David Hilbert, a mathematician, who more than 100 years ago developed a list of the unsolved problems he believed t...

متن کامل

Guest Editorial Special Issue on Grand Challenges for Modeling and Simulation

“One of the better aspects of human nature is our drive to seek out and conquer challenges. We seem imbued with a desire to formulate problems of the highest degree of difficulty and then to relentlessly pursue their solution. The identification and pursuit of Grand Challenges has been a hallmark of the high-performance computing arena for over a decade. In recent years, many other technical co...

متن کامل

From the Editors Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods: Rigor without Rigor Mortis

Editor’s note: This editorial is part of a series written by editors and co-authored with a senior executive, thought leader, or scholar to explore new content areas and grand challenges with the goal of expanding the scope, interestingness, and relevance of the work presented in the Academy of Management Journal. The principle is to use the editorial notes as “stage setters” to open up fresh, ...

متن کامل

GRAND CHALLENGES Grand challenges in organismal biology

Grand challenges in organismal biology Kurt Schwenk,* Dianna K. Padilla, George S. Bakken and Robert J. Full Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3043, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5245, USA; Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity Studies, Indiana State University, Terre ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011